The following document is provided by the LWVVC for your information, and posting on this site does not imply an endorsement by the LWVVC.  It was written by Aiden Magee of the Volusia Flagler Environmental Action Committee, Inc., and Mr. Magee has agreed to have it posted on this site.  It has been converted for the web, but it has not been edited. 

 

 

  VOLUSIA GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMISSION report  

 

Volusia Growth Management Commission (VGMC) is a 21 member representative advisory board funded by the residents of Volusia County . It discusses and possibly illuminates resolutions to conflict incurred when adjacent comprehensive plans from adjoining local governments negatively impact in their long term plans. It has no enforcement powers, just advice and influence. Neither is it a mediator. Some folk may say it is a ‘talk shop’ with no teeth however I wish to incite you to develop yourselves, or at least suggest to broaden your present remit and seek a greater sphere of influence by going where only brave members dare.

 

The advocates of the Smart Growth Report suggest you pack your bags.

The cities are not happy with your role because they want to be in control of their own development destiny in fast developing Volusia.

The media continually refers to you as the ‘ghost of Christmas past’ because you have outlived your use fullness.

My oh my folks. I look at you all and I am acutely aware of the meaning of ‘endangered species’.

 

My submission this evening might be interpreted by some as a wake-up call. Like Robin Williams in “Good morning Vietnam“. Others of you might choose to ignore what I pose, some claim it’s not your remit and others of you attempt to shoot the messenger. However I wish to state briefly my concerns for VGMC and the current rash of development taking place in Volusia. I trust you will be reactive afterwards…………….when I am far from here.

 

You must advise the political masters in the County that you wish to broaden your remit to that of an honest broker in the current climate of run-a-way development within the County. It is what is lacking when the ‘players’ sit down to carve the fast disappearing carcass of beautiful Volusia. There is no honest broker, honest enough and strong enough readily available, willing to put their head above the parapet.

There has to be a reputable honest broker available to exercise common sense between the ‘players’ when they  attempt to achieve financial gain at the cost of us all.

 

The cities are on a frenzied diet of annexation to satisfy their addiction to fill their tax base with as much unincorporated rural Volusia  as they can grab before the neighboring city gets there first. They think they are playing ‘Texas hold ‘em’, and the first to blink loses. They claim they are annexing to provide good places for the baby boomers to relocate here when they retire to have a good quality of life in sunny Florida. However, when they run these service lines of water/sewer/services/schools etc. into rural Volusia they exercise fiscal prudence. In lay men’s talk that means get as many subdivisions on your system as possible to maximize return on your financial investment. Another terminology might best describe them as developers. Service developers. That fact inadvertently leads to the cities advocating smart growth as touted by the Smart Growth Report. The Smart Growth Report was funded in no small measure by the home builders of Volusia.

The home builders of Volusia want to provide new homes for the masses of arriving baby boomers. Little houses ( or should I say large houses) built in rows and they all look the same. Their idea of utopia is, clusters however let me remind you that clusters are sub-divisions and sub-divisions are sprawl no matter how you dress it up. The home builder developers prefer green field sites rather than brown field sites because of the greater return of profit through greater building density and low costs. They are not interested in building ‘ranchette’ homes in the rural community. Economies of scale are not easily available there and anyway only 2% of rural Americans earn their living on the farm now. Not a market the home builders see as a priority.

There are winners/losers in every form of development however the biggest loser of all is the fast disappearing  Florida wetland environment and wildlife.

 

This apocalyptic trend has to end. Someone has to call halt. We have to develop a common interest that satisfy’s all the players. We have to develop TRUST. I submit VGMC must present itself  as a candidate for this roll. VGMC will have to reconstitute itself to do so however, it must present itself. There is no more important cause in Volusia County at the moment. However, is VGMC brave enough to respond to the call and is VGMC willing to enter the fray?

 

What can VGMC do?

 

I submit you can;

 

1.        Advise Volusia County that it needs a new comprehensive plan agreed between all the local governments. One that identifies growth boundaries’ agreeable to most We do not have one.

 

2.        Advise everyone that the new comprehensive plan must be adhered to and enforced. It would help to have all the comprehensive plans in the County/cities running on the same time scale along side this new plan.

 

3.        The new  plan must be amendment resistant by ‘seekers of variances’.

 

4.        Land change use applications for annexed properties that choose to jump boundaries must retain the land use the property held before application.

 

5.        Presently there are 5 governing agencies with at least 5 different ordinance standards pertaining to the rural environment and wetlands in Volusia County. They are:

           US Army Corps of Engineers

           St Johns River Water Management District

           Florida Department of Environmental Protection

           Volusia County Environmental Management Division

           Local  city/town governments.

Our agreed new County wide Comp. Plan has to reflect common standards in ordinances to achieve a common goal.

 

6.        Environmental mitigation credits must be exercised on-site and not shuffled off to Alaska or deepest everglade cross roads ,Florida.

 

 

VGMC members, I do not wish to infringe further upon your advisory role so I will conclude and allow you to exercise your minds.

 

However, I will conclude by reiterating:

           We need a plan

           We need a comprehensive plan

           We need a comprehensive plan that is agreed.

 

VGMC has a role to play………………………….Start playing.

 

 

Aiden. Magee, Volusia Flagler Environmental Action Committee. Inc.                     aiden.magee@hotmail.com

 

28 January 2006